Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Lehi development tracker

X Development 2100 North Subdivision and zone change

A 65-66 lot concept and a request to rezone 20.10 acres from A-5 to Neighborhood Commercial and R-1-Flex. The concept was tabled June 29 pending a traffic study; the zone change was withdrawn July 27, returned Aug. 10 and both were tabled again Oct. 12, 2021 because the applicant was not present.

Tabled

Type
Subdivision
Location
About 2100 North 2300 West
Size
20.1 acres
Homes
66
Applicant
X Development
  1. Oct 12, 2021City Council: X Development zone change (Ordinance 56-2021)
  2. Oct 12, 2021City Council: 2100 North subdivision concept
  3. Aug 10, 2021City Council: X Development zone change and 2100 North Subdivision concept (Ordinance 34-2021)
  4. Jul 27, 2021City Council: X Development zone change (Ordinance 34-2021)
  5. Jul 13, 2021City Council: X Development 2100 North Subdivision concept

In brief

X Development 2100 North Subdivision and zone change appears on 5 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of June 29, 2021 to the City Council meeting of October 12, 2021.

On record, it was tabled 3 times and withdrawn once.

The most recent decision was tabled (5-0) at the City Council meeting of October 12, 2021.

Follow the money and project delivery

X Development 2100 North Subdivision and zone change

Tabled

  1. Council action

    No approval or denial linked in the records collected.

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. October 12, 2021 · City Council

    X Development zone change (Ordinance 56-2021)

    Tabled · 5-0

    Tabled from Aug. 10; the presentation was put on hold because the applicant was not present, and the council tabled the request to rezone 20.10 acres from A-5 to Neighborhood Commercial and R-1-Flex.

    • Acres: 20.10
    • Zoning: A-5 → Neighborhood Commercial and R-1-Flex (requested)

    Moved by Council Member Katie Koivisto, seconded by Council Member Mike Southwick. Vote: Unanimous, 5-0

  2. October 12, 2021 · City Council

    2100 North subdivision concept

    Tabled · 5-0

    Heard with item 10, the council tabled concept approval for the 66-lot development.

    • Lots: 66

    Moved by Council Member Katie Koivisto, seconded by Council Member Mike Southwick. Vote: Unanimous, 5-0

  3. August 10, 2021 · City Council

    X Development zone change and 2100 North Subdivision concept (Ordinance 34-2021)

    Pending

    Agenda items for rezoning 20.10 acres from A-5 (agriculture) to Neighborhood Commercial and R-1-Flex, and for concept approval of a 66-lot residential development tabled June 29.

    • Acres: 20.10
    • Lots: 66 (concept)
  4. July 27, 2021 · City Council

    X Development zone change (Ordinance 34-2021)

    Withdrawn

    The proposed zone change of 20.10 acres from A-5 (agriculture) to Neighborhood Commercial and R-1-Flex residential was withdrawn from the agenda.

    • Acres: 20.10
    • Zoning: A-5 → Neighborhood Commercial and R-1-Flex (requested)
  5. July 13, 2021 · City Council

    X Development 2100 North Subdivision concept

    Pending

    The agenda says this 65-lot concept, tabled June 29, was pulled from the July 13 agenda.

  6. June 29, 2021 · City Council

    X Development 2100 North Subdivision concept

    Tabled · 5-0

    Erin Towner, for the applicant, proposed a 65-lot development with 32-foot private drives (28 feet of asphalt, allowing parking) and 20-foot driveways, and asked for 66 lots as a density bonus in lieu of trail improvements. The main question was whether to seek an access to 2100 North; the applicant had removed it, saying it may not be legally required and neighbors did not want it. Staff considered the access important for connectivity, and the city attorney said code requires it unless UDOT denies it, though the council could waive it in a development agreement. The mayor asked for a traffic analysis and noted a neighboring subdivision lacks such access. Residents split: some feared the access would be used to bypass an intersection and endanger children, others said it should be required. The council tabled the item, directing a traffic study, staff determination of bonus lots, and a possible development agreement if the access is found unnecessary.

    • Applicant: X Development (Erin Towner)
    • Lots: 65 proposed; 66 requested with bonus

    Moved by Council Member Chris Condie (the minutes name Condie as seconder as well). Vote: Unanimous, 5-0