Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

American Fork development tracker

Accessory building code amendment (17.5.105)

Changes to the size limits and approval process for residential accessory buildings. The council denied a version March 14, 2023, discussed accessory structures over 1,000 square feet in September, and on Dec. 12 tabled a version moving approval from the planning commission to the building official.

Tabled

Type
Code change
Applicant
American Fork City
  1. Dec 12, 2023City Council: Accessory building size and approval code amendment (17.5.105)
  2. Sep 19, 2023City Council: Work session: accessory structures over 1,000 square feet
  3. Mar 14, 2023City Council: Accessory building size code amendment (Section 17.5.105)

In brief

Accessory building code amendment (17.5.105) appears on 3 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of March 14, 2023 to the City Council meeting of December 12, 2023.

On record, it was denied once and tabled once.

The most recent decision was tabled (3-2) at the City Council meeting of December 12, 2023, with Council Member Rob Shelton, Council Member Clark Taylor voting no.

Follow the money and project delivery

Accessory building code amendment (17.5.105)

Tabled

  1. Council action

    Denied: Accessory building size code amendment (Section 17.5.105) · Approved minutes Record → · March 14, 2023

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. December 12, 2023 · City Council

    Accessory building size and approval code amendment (17.5.105)

    Tabled · 3-2

    The amendment would move accessory building approval from the planning commission to the building official. Staff preferred the draft sent to the planning commission, which gave criteria such as 'undue negative impact'; the commission's version differed after a sharp split. Shelton, who originated the change, said residents complain about going to the planning commission and that setbacks belong in zone rules; legal counsel Cherylyn Egner said materials rules must stay, for example to restrict shipping containers. Council Member Ryan Hunter moved to table and take it to a January work session.

    Moved by Council Member Ryan Hunter, seconded by Council Member Staci Carroll. Vote: 3-2; Shelton, Taylor voted no

  2. September 19, 2023 · City Council

    Work session: accessory structures over 1,000 square feet

    Discussed

    O'Brien said Section 17.5.105 sends accessory buildings over 1,000 square feet to the planning commission with only three review criteria, while residents now propose large shops, pool houses, sport courts and theaters, raising drainage, materials, open space, geotechnical and encroachment concerns. Shelton said the 2013 change was a mistake and building officials should handle permits; Building Official Dan Loveland said the development code has holes and conflicts with building code. O'Brien said the $200 code amendment fee is far below neighbors' $800-$1,200 and invites piecemeal amendments. Hunter objected to council members managing staff from the dais; Carroll said the council should tell staff to fix the system. Bunker proposed Shelton meet with staff and legal.

    • Code amendment fee: $200 (neighbors $800-$1,200)
  3. March 14, 2023 · City Council

    Accessory building size code amendment (Section 17.5.105)

    Denied · 5-0

    Would reduce the permitted size of accessory buildings so they aren't larger than the home and clarify the approval process. Council members raised concerns about the size reduction, approvals and agricultural building materials; Frost asked for a work session and Shelton wanted it back before the planning commission. Denied.

    Moved by Council Member Ryan Hunter, seconded by Council Member Kevin Barnes. Vote: 5-0