Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Logan development tracker

Westfield Warehouse rezone

Rezone of about 10.5 acres from Commercial Services to Commercial to allow live/work units. The Planning Commission tied 3-3; the council approved it 3-2 on July 21, 2020.

Approved

Type
Zone change
Location
130 South 1200 West
Size
10.5 acres
Applicant
Westfield Warehouse

In brief

Westfield Warehouse rezone appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of July 21, 2020.

On record, it was approved once.

The most recent decision was approved (3-2) at the City Council meeting of July 21, 2020, with Council Member Jess Bradfield, Council Member Jeannie Simmonds voting no.

Follow the money and project delivery

Westfield Warehouse rezone

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved: Westfield Warehouse rezone, 130 South 1200 West (Ordinance 20-15) · Approved minutes Record → · July 21, 2020

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. July 21, 2020 · City Council

    Westfield Warehouse rezone, 130 South 1200 West (Ordinance 20-15)

    Approved · 3-2

    The council rezoned about 10.5 acres from Commercial Services (CS) to Commercial (COM) to allow live/work units. The Planning Commission had tied 3-3 on June 11. Project representative Bo Johnson said 10 to 20 percent of buyers have expressed interest in residential space. Council Member Simmonds opposed the rezone, citing concern about approving a project and then changing its zoning; Council Member Jensen supported it. The minutes list only the two no votes; the yes count of three is the remaining members present.

    • Acres: about 10.5
    • Current zone → proposed: Commercial Services (CS) → Commercial (COM)
    • Planning Commission: tied 3-3, June 11

    Moved by Council Member Tom Jensen, seconded by Council Member Mark Anderson. Vote: 3-2; Council Members Jess Bradfield and Jeannie Simmonds voted no (minutes list only the no votes)