Lake City Flats micro-apartments
A five-story, 109-unit studio micro-apartment building downtown in the CC-1 zone proposing one parking stall per unit instead of 2.25. The Planning Commission denied it; the council denied the appeal Aug. 24, 2021, to revisit the parking standard. Applicant Diego Carroll is the husband of Councilmember Staci Carroll, who recused.
Denied
- Type
- Site plan
- Location
- 95 N. Barratt Ave.
- Size
- 1.35 acres
- Homes
- 109
- Applicant
- Chad Pollard and Diego Carroll
In brief
Lake City Flats micro-apartments appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of August 24, 2021.
On record, it was denied once.
The most recent decision was denied (4-0) at the City Council meeting of August 24, 2021.
Follow the money and project delivery
Lake City Flats micro-apartments
- Council action
Denied: Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Lake City Flats micro-apartments, 95 N. Barratt Ave. · Approved minutes Record → · Aug. 24, 2021
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
August 24, 2021 · City Council
Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Lake City Flats micro-apartments, 95 N. Barratt Ave.
Denied · 4-0
Applicants Chad Pollard and Diego Carroll appealed the Planning Commission's denial of a five-story, 109-unit studio/micro-apartment building on 1.35 acres in the CC-1 zone with one parking stall per unit, versus the code's 2.25. They cited an ITE-based estimate of 69-95 stalls needed, peer-reviewed for traffic by Hales Engineering, and other cities' one-stall rules, said they felt 'strung along,' and mentioned possible legal action; they offered 1.25 stalls but not 2. Public Works said the Hales review did not endorse the parking. Councilmembers Taylor and Hunter supported the project; Shelton worried about precedent because CC-1 density is limited only by parking. The council denied the appeal so the parking standard could be taken up at a Sept. 7 joint work session.
- Applicants: Chad Pollard and Diego Carroll
- Units: 109 studios on 1.35 acres (about 80 units/acre)
- Requested parking: 1 stall/unit; code 2.25
- Connection: applicant Diego Carroll is Councilmember Staci Carroll's husband; she declared the conflict and recused
- Property partnered with the Romero family (proposed name Romero Place)