Osmond annexation
About 6.46 acres annexed with Commercial zoning for an office building; intent to annex Jan. 14 and annexation approved Feb. 25, 2020.
Approved
- Type
- Annexation
- Size
- 6.46 acres
- Location
- Digital Drive, by the point of the mountain
- City Council: Osmond Annexation, 6.46 acres (Ordinance #11-2020)
- City Council: Osmond Site intent to annex, 6.46 acres (Resolution #2020-01)
In brief
Osmond annexation appears on 2 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of January 14, 2020 to the City Council meeting of February 25, 2020.
On record, it was approved with conditions 2 times.
The most recent decision was approved with conditions (4-0) at the City Council meeting of February 25, 2020.
Follow the money and project delivery
Osmond annexation
- Council action
Approved with conditions: Osmond Annexation, 6.46 acres (Ordinance #11-2020) · Approved minutes Record → · Feb. 25, 2020
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
February 25, 2020 · City Council
Osmond Annexation, 6.46 acres (Ordinance #11-2020)
Approved with conditions · 4-0
After a public hearing with no comments, the council approved annexation with Commercial zoning. Applicant Jared Osmond said he wants to build an office building and is working through utility connections.
- Acres: 6.46
- Zone: Commercial
January 14, 2020 · City Council
Osmond Site intent to annex, 6.46 acres (Resolution #2020-01)
Approved with conditions · 5-0
The council approved a resolution of intent to annex about 6.46 acres on Digital Drive near the point of the mountain with Commercial zoning. Applicant representative Jared Osmond said the plan is an office building. Council Member Katie Koivisto asked about the boundary line agreement with Utah County, and Osmond said it had been corrected.
- Acres: 6.46
- Proposed zone: Commercial