Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Orem development tracker

Spring Hollow Care Center rezone, 92 South 800 East

Rezone of about one acre from R-8 to C-1 with a recorded development agreement limiting use to Level II assisted living and memory care, a 30-foot height cap and landscape screening, to allow an addition of 18 memory care beds to a facility operating since 1997. Approved 4-2 on May 12, 2026.

Approved

Type
Zone change
Location
92 South 800 East
Size
1 acre
Applicant
Julie Smith, Spring Hollow Care Center

In brief

Spring Hollow Care Center rezone, 92 South 800 East appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of May 12, 2026.

On record, it was approved with conditions once.

The most recent decision was approved with conditions (4-2) at the City Council meeting of May 12, 2026, with Council Member LaNae Millett, Council Member Crystal Muhlestein voting no.

Follow the money and project delivery

Spring Hollow Care Center rezone, 92 South 800 East

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved with conditions: Rezone about 1.0 acre at 92 South 800 East from R-8 to C-1 with development agreement (Spring Hollow Care Center) · Approved minutes Record → · May 12, 2026

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. May 12, 2026 · City Council

    Rezone about 1.0 acre at 92 South 800 East from R-8 to C-1 with development agreement (Spring Hollow Care Center)

    Approved with conditions · 5-2 with the mayor

    The Spring Hollow residential care center has operated since a 1997 conditional use permit and houses 32 residents in two buildings, more than the current eight-resident limit in residential zones, so it is a legal nonconforming use that cannot expand. The owners proposed a two-story addition connecting the buildings, adding 18 memory care beds (56% more), a central kitchen and dining rooms, and sought C-1 zoning bound by a recorded development agreement limiting the use to assisted living for people 60 and older. Terms include a 30-foot height cap, mature Blue Atlas Cedar screening on 20-foot centers along the shared fence in place of the Planning Commission's frosted second-story windows, quiet HVAC units on the north side facing a church lot, 21 parking stalls (20 required), and Medicaid-subsidized residents. At the hearing a neighbor questioned spot zoning and what a future buyer could do; another resident whose property abuts the site objected that C-1 allows up to 48 feet and commercial equipment noise; a written comment questioned quality of care and privacy. City Attorney Steve Earl noted the elevation drawings were not attached to the agreement, so the council paused the item while exhibits were completed and returned later in the evening. The final agreement caps height at 30 feet and limits the facility to Level II memory care residents who cannot drive. Council Members Millett and Muhlestein opposed, saying planning should bring nonconforming uses toward surrounding zoning and questioning a commercial label in a low-density area; staff noted a planned development zone requires three acres.

    • Applicant: Julie Smith, Spring Hollow Care Center
    • Acres: about 1.0
    • Current zone to proposed: R-8 to C-1 with development agreement
    • Beds: 32 to 50 (18 new memory care beds)
    • Planning Commission: recommended frosted second-story windows

    Moved by Council Member Jenn Gale, seconded by Council Member Jeff Lambson. Vote: 4-2; Council Members LaNae Millett and Crystal Muhlestein voted no; Mayor McCandless also voted yes