Park City soils repository (Gordo site)
Proposed city soils repository of up to 140,000 cubic yards at the Gordo site near Richardson Flat. After a July 15, 2021 public hearing, a majority of council on Aug. 19 favored not proceeding with the repository and continuing outreach, a hauling study and sampling.
- Where it stands
- Withdrawn
- Type
- Public project
- Location
- Gordo site near Richardson Flat
Every hearing and vote
July 9, 2020 · City Council
Soil management facility design services at the Gordo property
Pending
First amendment to the IGES design services agreement for a soil management facility at the Gordo property at the Richardson Flat intersection and SR-248, not to exceed $105,000.
April 15, 2021 · City Council
Consent agenda: water repair, soils facility liner, grant support, transit plan
Approved · 5-0
The council raised the Daley Excavators contract by $1,000,000 (total up to $2,000,000) and the JWW Excavating contract by $200,000 (total up to $400,000); approved Texas Environmental Plastics for the Soils Management Facility Cell 1 liner (up to $308,990.70), Horrocks Engineers for project management and grant support 2021 to 2024 (up to $145,000) and Fehr & Peers for Short Range Transit Plan project management (up to $162,000).
May 13, 2021 · City Council
Park City soils (Gordo) stakeholder outreach
Discussed
Council discussed a possible 60-day pause and added outreach, including Summit County on the stakeholder list. Two residents spoke against a city soils repository, one suggesting Richardson Flat. No vote.
July 15, 2021 · City Council
Public hearing: soils management facility
Discussed
About 17 speakers raised the 1,000-foot stream setback exemption, lead and arsenic, wind-blown dust, costs and transparency. The Gordo site holds about 35,000 cubic feet of existing soil and the planned repository is up to 140,000 cubic yards; council must authorize staff to seek the stream-distance exemption. Staff cited about $17 million spent hauling soil to Tooele. No vote.
August 19, 2021 · City Council
Soils management facility follow-up
Discussed
Four options were presented. Council Member Steve Joyce called it a $20 million problem and asked for a bid to haul away exposed soil. The mayor said the consensus was not to proceed with the repository and to favor continued outreach, a hauling study, sampling and re-engaging the EPA; staff confirmed the city would not pursue the state permit application.
September 21, 2023 · City Council
Gordo property feasibility
Discussed
The site has contaminated soils, a Public Works recycling operation and a surplus UDOT parcel acquired in 2016. Remediation is estimated at $3 million to $4 million, with $4 million set aside. A park-and-ride study estimated a rough cost of $31.8 million, with over 800 surface spaces or a structure that could allow 200 affordable housing units. Dickey said commercial uses were not needed; Doilney said some commercial would improve the arrival experience. Consensus: staff will return with concepts. No vote.
March 7, 2024 · City Council
Gordo property update
Discussed
The proposed concept includes 1,500 parking stalls, 266 housing units, 50,000 square feet of mixed use, 100,000 square feet for a garage, transit and public safety, and 90,000 square feet of rooftop recreation. Soil remediation is estimated at about $4 million with cleanup to begin around May. Ciraco and Parigian were concerned about traffic and site suitability; Parigian opposed an RFP before public input; Rubell wanted a wide income range in housing. Consensus, with no formal vote: a majority supported soil removal and an RFP for remediation; the mayor requested public engagement and the site-use RFP is on hold.
May 16, 2024 · City Council
Environmental remediation at the Gordo property: oversight and soil excavation and hauling
Approved · 5-0
Soil samples showed the soil is unsuitable for residential or commercial use and violates state solid waste rules; the state could require the city to move it. The city manager said the city received a demand letter. Ciraco had reservations about the lack of a clear site plan.