351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone
Request to rezone about 0.92 acres from NR-6 to Commercial. The Planning Commission recommended approval 5-2 and staff recommended approval, but the council denied it 3-2 on October 1, 2024, with three members preferring to wait for the new General Plan.
Denied
- Type
- Zone change
- Location
- 351 South 100 East
- Size
- 0.92 acres
- Applicant
- TEA (property owners)
- City Council: 351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone from NR-6 to COM, Ordinance 24-16
- City Council: 351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone from NR-6 to COM, Ordinance 24-16 (public hearing)
- City Council: Workshop: 351 South 100 East rezone, Ordinance 24-16
In brief
351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone appears on 3 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of September 3, 2024 to the City Council meeting of October 1, 2024.
On record, it was continued once and denied once.
The most recent decision was denied (2-3) at the City Council meeting of October 1, 2024, with Council Member Amy Anderson, Council Member Mike Johnson, Council Member Jeannie Simmonds voting no.
Follow the money and project delivery
351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone
- Council action
Denied: 351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone from NR-6 to COM, Ordinance 24-16 · Approved minutes Record → · Oct. 1, 2024
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
October 1, 2024 · City Council
351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone from NR-6 to COM, Ordinance 24-16
Denied · 2-3
The motion to rezone about 0.92 acres failed 2-3. The Planning Commission and staff had recommended approval, 5-2 at the commission. The proponents said a gas station was not planned, though the zone would allow one absent a deed restriction. Council Members Simmonds, Amy Anderson and Johnson preferred waiting for the new General Plan; Council Members López and Mark Anderson supported the change. The minutes say both 'motion carried' and 'motion is denied' in the same entry, which should be checked.
- Acres: about 0.92
- Current zone → proposed: NR-6 → COM
September 17, 2024 · City Council
351 South 100 East (TEA) rezone from NR-6 to COM, Ordinance 24-16 (public hearing)
Continued · 5-0
The hearing covered about 0.92 acres. The Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval. Dr. Gail Yost opposed the change, citing neighborhood character; Matthew Fatuesi preferred NR-6 because of traffic; Joshua Molitor wanted the zone kept, citing road capacity. The council continued the item to October 1 as an action item with no new hearing at the proponents' request because of a family medical emergency. Council Member Mark Anderson said he knows both proponents and has no vested interest; City Attorney Craig Carlston said he would not need to recuse.
- Acres: about 0.92
- Current zone → proposed: NR-6 → COM
- Planning Commission: recommended approval 5-2
September 3, 2024 · City Council
Workshop: 351 South 100 East rezone, Ordinance 24-16
Discussed
Staff previewed rezoning about 0.92 acres from NR-6 to Commercial; the Planning Commission voted 5-2 to recommend approval. Action was set for September 17.