Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Logan development tracker

100 North TC-2 to NR-6 rezone

Request to rezone eight parcels, mostly owner-occupied historic homes, from TC-2 to NR-6. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended denial and the council denied it January 16, 2024, agreeing to reevaluate TC-2 in the future.

DeniedStatus as of Jan 16, 2024

Type
Zone change
Size
2 acres
Applicant
Seven property owners
Location
100 North between 100 East and 200 East
  1. Jan 16, 2024City Council: 100 North rezone from TC-2 to NR-6, Ordinance 23-35 (continued public hearing)
  2. Dec 5, 2023City Council: 100 North rezone from TC-2 to NR-6, Ordinance 23-35 (public hearing)
  3. Nov 21, 2023City Council: Workshop: 100 North rezone from TC-2 to NR-6, Ordinance 23-35

In brief

100 North TC-2 to NR-6 rezone appears on 3 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of November 21, 2023 to the City Council meeting of January 16, 2024.

On record, it was continued once and denied once.

The most recent decision was denied (4-0) at the City Council meeting of January 16, 2024.

Follow the money and project delivery

100 North TC-2 to NR-6 rezone

Denied

  1. Council action

    Denied according to the dated project source. Record → · Jan. 16, 2024

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. January 16, 2024 · City Council

    100 North rezone from TC-2 to NR-6, Ordinance 23-35 (continued public hearing)

    Denied · 4-0

    The council voted to deny the request covering eight parcels. The Planning Commission had recommended denial 6-0. Council Member Simmonds recused herself at 7:20 p.m., but the roll call as recorded still lists her as voting aye, which should be checked against the minutes. Discussion covered historic homes, the 2018 TC-2 zoning and a possible General Plan update; DeSimone suggested residents consider a homeowners association as an alternative, and the council agreed to reevaluate TC-2 in the future.

    Moved by Council Member Mark Anderson, seconded by Council Member Mike Johnson. Vote: 4-0 as recorded on the motion to deny; the roll call lists Council Member Simmonds as aye although the minutes say she recused; López absent

  2. December 5, 2023 · City Council

    100 North rezone from TC-2 to NR-6, Ordinance 23-35 (public hearing)

    Continued · 4-0-1

    The request covers eight parcels, about 2 acres, on both sides of 100 North between 100 East and 200 East. Staff recommended denial as contrary to Ordinance 18-07 and the Planning Commission voted 6-0 for denial on November 9. Reed Bolam asked for transparency and preservation of the historic homes. The council discussed the commercial zoning history (north side since the 1950s, south side since the 1980s), preservation goals and whether a downzone was needed. Council Member Simmonds recused herself from discussion and abstained in the vote. The council continued the item to January 16 as an action item with no new hearing.

    • Acres: about 2
    • Current zone → proposed: TC-2 → NR-6

    Moved by Council Member Mark Anderson, seconded by Council Member Amy Anderson. Vote: 4-0-1; Council Member Simmonds abstained

  3. November 21, 2023 · City Council

    Workshop: 100 North rezone from TC-2 to NR-6, Ordinance 23-35

    Discussed

    Planner Tanya Rice presented a request on behalf of seven owners to rezone eight parcels on about 2 acres of 100 North between 100 East and 200 East from TC-2 to NR-6. Five parcels are owner-occupied historic single-family homes, two are vacant and one is a grandfathered triplex. Staff recommended denial as in conflict with Ordinance 18-07, and the Planning Commission voted 6-0 for denial on November 9. Council Member Simmonds recused herself from the discussion. Action was set for December 5.

    • Acres: about 2
    • Current zone → proposed: TC-2 → NR-6
    • Planning Commission: recommended denial 6-0