Marwood Group concept
A five-story mixed-use building with 31 units proposed on 0.84 acres in the transit-oriented area. The council approved the concept in January 2024 with a cap of 25 units, saying it would reconsider more if traffic or area studies support it.
Approved
- Type
- Site plan
- Location
- 301 E. State Street
- Size
- 0.84 acres
- Homes
- 31
- Applicant
- Marwood Group (Curtis Minor, representative)
In brief
Marwood Group concept appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of January 9, 2024.
On record, it was approved with conditions once.
The most recent decision was approved with conditions (4-1) at the City Council meeting of January 9, 2024, with Council Member Paige Albrecht voting no.
Follow the money and project delivery
Marwood Group concept
- Council action
Approved according to the dated project source. Record → · Jan. 9, 2024
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
January 9, 2024 · City Council
Marwood Group concept, 31-unit residential building
Approved with conditions · 4-1
Curtis Minor, for the applicant, proposed a five-story mixed-use building with 31 units on 0.84 acres; one unit could later convert to commercial. The area is designated for 250 housing units, 74 of which are used, leaving 176. City Engineer Lorin Powell said the current access road limits the area to 50 units without another access point. Council members worried about using scarce density in the transit-oriented zone on one small site ahead of the city's station-area study; the developer said it had worked to comply with current zoning. A motion by Council Member Condie to approve as presented (with an open-space assurance) failed 2-3. A second motion by Council Member Hancock approved the concept with a cap of 25 units (reduced from 23 during discussion), with the council willing to reconsider if traffic or other studies support 31 units. Council Member Stallings suggested four levels instead of five.
- Applicant representative: Curtis Minor
- Acres: 0.84
- Units: 31 proposed, capped at 25
- Conditions: maximum 25 units; reconsideration if studies support more