Dry Creek Village zone change
A 16-acre proposal to rezone from TH-5 (transitional holding) to Mixed Use for a village with about 500 units discussed and a 142-unit first phase. The council denied it 5-0 on Aug. 8, 2023 after extensive resident opposition over traffic and density.
Denied
- Type
- Zone change
- Location
- Approximately 1450 South 1100 West
- Size
- 16 acres
- Homes
- 500
- Applicant
- Represented by Tony Trane
In brief
Dry Creek Village zone change appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of August 8, 2023.
On record, it was denied once.
The most recent decision was denied (5-0) at the City Council meeting of August 8, 2023.
Follow the money and project delivery
Dry Creek Village zone change
- Council action
Denied according to the dated project source. Record → · Aug. 8, 2023
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
August 8, 2023 · City Council
Dry Creek Village zone change, 16 acres, TH-5 to Mixed Use (Ordinance 43-2023)
Denied · 5-0
Representative Tony Trane presented a mix of single-family homes, townhomes and possibly condos with trails to a school, park and commercial areas, and offered a temporary construction connection to 1700 West. About 40 residents spoke; most opposed the plan or raised traffic and safety concerns, while Jeremy Baker supported it as bringing people closer to the park, churches and school. Council members questioned whether the overlay was unique enough, objected to approving the project piecemeal without a comprehensive plan, said 500 units on 16 acres might be too many, and wanted a clear retail component and a road solution. Council Member Koivisto moved to deny, finding the plan would have a negative effect on the surrounding area, was not suitable and did not comply with the general plan; all five members voted yes. The related concept plan for a 142-unit first phase (item 11) was removed from the agenda.
- Acres: 16
- Current zone → proposed: TH-5 (transitional holding) → Mixed Use
- Density discussed: about 500 units
- Representative: Tony Trane
- Concept plan for 142 units (item 11) removed from agenda