Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Lehi development tracker

Non-residential buffer and screening code amendment

Proposed increased fence heights, material limits and wider buffers (including a 30-foot buffer) where non-residential zones adjoin residential. Tabled Mar. 18, 2025 for changes with the Planning Commission.

Tabled

Type
Code change
Location
Citywide

In brief

Non-residential buffer and screening code amendment appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of March 18, 2025.

On record, it was tabled once.

The most recent decision was tabled (4-0) at the City Council meeting of March 18, 2025.

Follow the money and project delivery

Non-residential buffer and screening code amendment

Tabled

  1. Council action

    No approval or denial linked in the records collected.

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. March 18, 2025 · City Council

    Ordinance 14-2025: buffer and screening for non-residential zones next to residential (Chapter 12)

    Tabled · 4-0

    The amendments would raise fence heights, restrict materials, widen buffers and change landscaping rules. Mark Skousen of Hadco Construction said the company wants to be a good neighbor but the 30-foot buffer may be unnecessarily restrictive. Teresa Gonzalez sought effective barriers against sight lines and sound while recognizing business costs. Council concerns included height differences, cost to businesses, sound barrier effectiveness and water use. The council tabled it and directed staff to work with the Planning Commission on changes.

    Moved by Council Member Chris Condie, seconded by Council Member Heather Newall. Vote: 4-0 with Council Member Paul Hancock absent