Thursday, October 15, 2026The Utah Ledger

Everything Utah, every day.

Eagle Mountain · City Council

Council approves SilverLake 32 site plan and owner-name rule for utility accounts, 4-0, with mayor and Gray excused

September 21, 2021, 4:00 p.m. · Eagle Mountain City Council Chambers, 1650 E Stagecoach Run, Eagle Mountain, Utah

With Mayor Tom Westmoreland and Council Member Jared Gray excused, Mayor Pro Tempore Melissa Clark presided. The council approved the SilverLake 32 site plan with six conditions and an ordinance requiring utility accounts to be in the property owner's name, both 4-0. The work session covered Oquirrh Mountain Ranch, the Eagle Quest concept plan and Fire Station 251 colors.

From the approved minutes. Updated October 14, 2026.

Decisions at a glance

Agenda, item by item

  1. Item 13.A · Development

    SilverLake 32 site plan

    Approved with conditions · 4-0 · SilverLake, Area C, along Golden Eagle Road

    Plat 32 covers 91 lots on about 9.92 acres (33 cluster lots and 58 townhomes) in Area C of the SilverLake master plan. It requires 31 guest stalls and provides 27, with a 40-foot private right-of-way against the 43 feet approved for Plat 31, and 1.46 acres of open space across Plats 31 and 32. Council Member Colby Curtis asked staff to verify required masonry wrapping on finished units and voiced frustration that the developer did not keep the agreement in good faith; Council Member Carolyn Love was disappointed the phase does not connect to the asphalt trail. Steve Mumford said the agreement's example elevations show masonry wrapping though the text does not address it. The council approved the five Planning Commission conditions (collector road fencing, more parking, water-wise landscaping, matching rear and side materials, 43-foot right-of-way) plus 18 inches of masonry wrapping to the side of units.

    • Acres: about 9.92
    • Lots: 91 (33 cluster lots, 58 townhomes)
    • Guest parking: 27 provided, 31 required

    Moved by Council Member Carolyn Love, seconded by Council Member Colby Curtis. Vote: 4-0

    Follow SilverLake plats 28 to 31 in the development tracker →

  2. Item 14.A · City code

    Utility accounts in owner's name (Chapter 13.20.050)

    Approved · 4-0

    Evan Berrett said the rule requires utility accounts to be in the property owner's name to improve landlord communication and prevent unpaid bills after tenants leave. Landlords who want tenants to pay directly can sign a utility service agreement, bills will also go to landlords, and a six-month grace period is planned. Love supported the change; Council Member Melissa Clark worried renters unaware of the process could go days without water; Berrett said a new online application guides tenants.

    Moved by Council Member Donna Burnham, seconded by Council Member Carolyn Love. Vote: 4-0

  3. Item 1.B · Development

    Oquirrh Mountain Ranch amendment (work session)

    Discussed

    Tayler Jensen presented two options for the 2011 plan of 120.4 acres (reduced in 2016 to a maximum of 346 units). Option A has 229 lots with 40-, 45- and 50-foot frontages (maximum 283 units); Option B has 206 lots with 45-, 50- and 55-foot frontages (maximum 260 units); the applicant said 206 units was the minimum for financial viability. Current RC standards require 58-foot frontage. Curtis would consider a 50-foot minimum frontage and a small multifamily area; Council Member Donna Burnham credited the wildlife corridor dedication and lot variety; Clark worried multifamily could undermine the outcome; Love said greater lot depth and 10-foot garage setbacks mitigate narrow frontages. No motion.

    Follow Oquirrh Mountain Ranch in the development tracker →

  4. Item 1.C · Development

    Eagle Quest concept plan (work session)

    Discussed

    Applicant representative Kurt Ostler showed two concepts for a parcel west of Lake Mountain Road: 484 lots with a dedication of 12.27 acres of road right-of-way (56 more lots in exchange), or 428 lots without full collector dedication. A second parcel of about 160 acres west of Overland, north of Rush Creek, has mixed zones and a hospital user that asked for no single-family homes. Curtis argued the 12.5 acres of agricultural land equals about 2.5 lots, not 56. Members supported hospital and retail uses and suggested fewer multifamily units and development triggers. No action.

    Follow Eagle Quest in the development tracker →

  5. Item 1.D · Public safety

    Fire Station 251 color scheme (work session)

    Discussed

    UFA Assistant Chief Dominic Burchett and Dan Gasser of AJC Architects proposed dark brick, wood accents and glass doors. Members approved the scheme, preferring midnight black brick; Love and Clark said one side looked flat.

  6. Item 10-13 · Contract

    Consent agenda: Lone Tree signal change order

    Approved · 4-0

    The council approved Change Order 1 for the Lone Tree traffic signal with B Jackson Construction and the Sept. 7 minutes; a conservation easement agreement was removed at the applicant's request. The minutes give no dollar amount.

    Moved by Council Member Donna Burnham, seconded by Council Member Colby Curtis. Vote: 4-0

  7. Item 1.A · Roads and utilities

    City administrator update (work session)

    Discussed

    Staff reported 93 residential permits in August, a new planning manager and neighborhood improvement officer starting Oct. 4, Airport Road Phase 2 right-of-way work with completion targeted for September 2022, and water projects submitted to the state's American Rescue Plan match program (Well 1, transmission lines and reuse upgrades).

    Follow Airport Road alignment and design in the development tracker →

  8. Other

    Closed session motion

    Approved · 4-0

    The council voted to go into closed session to discuss reasonably imminent litigation and the purchase, lease or exchange of real property.

    Moved by Council Member Donna Burnham, seconded by Council Member Colby Curtis. Vote: 4-0

What residents said

Narrow lot frontagesMultifamily parkingWork vehicle signageTenant utility access

A resident who runs a home business said he cannot park a vehicle with business advertising at his residence while others may park commercial vehicles with non-business decals; staff said business equipment must be screened and a waiver can be requested. Burnham and Curtis agreed to discuss work vehicle signage standards.