Quinn's Junction Partnership (Studio Crossing)
Master planned development at 4001 Kearns Boulevard with 100 affordable and 100 market-rate units discussed July 15, 2021; phasing approved April 1, 2021.
Approved
- Type
- Development agreement
- Location
- 4001 Kearns Boulevard
- Homes
- 200
- City Council: Quinn's Junction / Studio Crossing, 4001 Kearns Boulevard
- City Council: Quinn's Junction Partnership master planned development phasing plan, 4001 Kearns Boulevard
In brief
Quinn's Junction Partnership (Studio Crossing) appears on 2 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of April 1, 2021 to the City Council meeting of July 15, 2021.
On record, it was approved once.
The most recent decision was approved (3-2) at the City Council meeting of April 1, 2021, with Council Member Becca Gerber, Council Member Nann Worel voting no.
Follow the money and project delivery
Quinn's Junction Partnership (Studio Crossing)
- Council action
Approved: Quinn's Junction Partnership master planned development phasing plan, 4001 Kearns Boulevard · Approved minutes Record → · April 1, 2021
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
July 15, 2021 · City Council
Quinn's Junction / Studio Crossing, 4001 Kearns Boulevard
Discussed
The proposal includes 100 affordable and 100 market-rate units. Council gave direction on process, nightly rentals and traffic, and some members asked for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. No vote.
April 1, 2021 · City Council
Quinn's Junction Partnership master planned development phasing plan, 4001 Kearns Boulevard
Approved · 3-2
Council Member Steve Joyce's first motion to amend phasing with added documentation requirements failed for lack of a second. His second motion added a condition requiring a substantive amendment and council review for changes in use, phasing or other buildings; it passed 3-2 with Council Members Becca Gerber and Nann Worel opposed. No one spoke at the hearing.