Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Orem development tracker

1600 North and 400 East intersection safety study

Study by JUB Engineers of five alternatives for improving safety where the Murdock Canal Trail crosses 1600 North at 400 East. Consultants recommended directional crossings or a pedestrian scramble short term and a grade-separated crossing long term, with an underpass estimated at about $10 million.

In review

Type
Road project
Location
1600 North and 400 East, Orem

In brief

1600 North and 400 East intersection safety study appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of May 28, 2024.

Follow the money and project delivery

1600 North and 400 East intersection safety study

In review

  1. Council action

    No approval or denial linked in the records collected.

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. May 28, 2024 · City Council

    1600 North and 400 East intersection study

    Discussed

    Consultants from JUB Engineers presented five alternatives for improving safety where the Murdock Canal Trail crosses the intersection: directional crosswalks with no right turns, a relocated crossing with a HAWK signal, a grade-separated crossing, a roundabout and a pedestrian scramble. An underpass was estimated at about $10 million and a pedestrian bridge at over $14.5 million. A survey drew 518 responses, ranking the grade-separated option safest, and 60 percent supported added safety even if drivers face delays; 111 people attended an open house. The consultants recommended directional crossings or a pedestrian scramble in the short term and a grade-separated crossing long term. No vote was taken.