Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Lehi development tracker

Home occupations code amendment (landscape and construction businesses)

Proposed amendment to Chapter 20 allowing landscape and construction businesses as conditional home occupations. Denied May 13, 2025; staff to explore a development agreement and business license changes.

Denied

Type
Code change
Applicant
Private petitioners

In brief

Home occupations code amendment (landscape and construction businesses) appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of May 13, 2025.

On record, it was denied once.

The most recent decision was denied (4-0) at the City Council meeting of May 13, 2025.

Follow the money and project delivery

Home occupations code amendment (landscape and construction businesses)

Denied

  1. Council action

    Denied: Home occupations code amendment for landscape and construction businesses (Ordinance 28-2025) · Approved minutes Record → · May 13, 2025

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. May 13, 2025 · City Council

    Home occupations code amendment for landscape and construction businesses (Ordinance 28-2025)

    Denied · 4-0

    Two petitioners who run a landscaping business sought changes allowing such businesses as conditional uses, with full use of accessory structures, limited deliveries and sales, vehicle limits and traffic plans. Council members, including Stallings, Hancock, Newall and Albrecht, said they sympathized but did not want a citywide ordinance for a single case, citing enforceability of conditional use permits and the commercialization of residential areas. The council denied the amendment and directed staff to work with the petitioners on a possible development agreement, keep a general plan amendment option open, and tighten business licensing follow-up. City Attorney Ryan Wood cautioned that agreements are usually tied to zoning changes.

    Moved by Council Member Paul Hancock, seconded by Council Member Heather Newall. Vote: 4-0; Council Member Chris Condie excused