Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Salt Lake City development tracker

Alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East

Vacation of part of a City-owned alley near South Edison Street and 200 East (PLNPCM2024-00439) despite a negative Planning Commission recommendation. The Council adopted Ordinance 28 of 2025 on May 6, 2025, 7-0.

ApprovedStatus as of May 6, 2025

Type
Zone change
Applicant
A private applicant
Location
Alley near South Edison Street and 1400 South 200 East
  1. May 6, 2025City Council: Alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East
  2. Apr 15, 2025City Council: Public hearing: alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East
  3. Mar 25, 2025City Council: Alley vacation near 1409 South Edison Street: set hearing (Petition PLNPCM2024-00439)
  4. Mar 18, 2025City Council work session: Alley vacation near 1409 South Edison Street

In brief

Alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East appears on 4 recorded agendas, from the City Council work session meeting of March 18, 2025 to the City Council meeting of May 6, 2025.

On record, it was approved 2 times and continued once.

The most recent decision was approved (7-0) at the City Council meeting of May 6, 2025.

Follow the money and project delivery

Alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved according to the dated project source. Record → · May 6, 2025

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. May 6, 2025 · City Council

    Alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East

    Approved · 7-0

    The Council adopted Ordinance 28 of 2025 vacating part of a City-owned alley near South Edison Street and 200 East, to be divided among abutting owners. The Planning Commission had forwarded a negative recommendation; the Council had held the hearing April 15.

    • Petition: PLNPCM2024-00439
    • Council District 5

    Moved by Council Member Puy, seconded by Council Member Mano. Vote: 7-0

  2. April 15, 2025 · City Council

    Public hearing: alley vacation near Edison Street and 200 East

    Continued · 6-0

    The Council heard a petition to vacate part of a City-owned alley in the 1400 block of South near Edison Street and 200 East. The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation. Speakers supported closing it, citing garbage, human waste, criminal activity and lack of City maintenance. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action.

    • Petition: PLNPCM2024-00439
    • Council District 5

    Moved by Council Member Mano, seconded by Council Member Dugan. Vote: 6-0 to close the hearing and defer action

  3. March 25, 2025 · City Council

    Alley vacation near 1409 South Edison Street: set hearing (Petition PLNPCM2024-00439)

    Approved · 7-0

    On consent, the Council set an April 15, 2025 hearing on vacating part of a City-owned alley. The Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation.

    Moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Mano. Vote: 7-0

  4. March 18, 2025 · City Council work session

    Alley vacation near 1409 South Edison Street

    Discussed

    Staff briefed the Council on a petition to vacate part of a City-owned alley beside properties at about 1409 South Edison Street and 1404 South 200 East, with the segment split between abutting owners. Planning staff recommended approval; the Planning Commission forwarded a negative recommendation. The applicants said the gate predated their ownership, neighbors supported the request, Fire and Police had no objections and they knew of no utility access issues. Council Members Puy and Petro rejoined during this item.

    • Council District 5