Rezone at 810 East 800 South
Rezones a parcel from R-2 to CB and amends the Central Community land use map to Community Commercial, for a planned two-story building with ground-floor commercial and upstairs residential units. Adopted as Ordinance 40 on July 20, 2021, 7-0.
Approved
- Type
- Zone change
- Location
- 810 East 800 South
- Applicant
- A private applicant
- City Council: Rezone and master plan amendment at 810 East 800 South
- City Council: Rezone and master plan amendment at 810 East 800 South
In brief
Rezone at 810 East 800 South appears on 2 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of July 13, 2021 to the City Council meeting of July 20, 2021.
On record, it was continued once and approved once.
The most recent decision was approved (7-0) at the City Council meeting of July 20, 2021.
Follow the money and project delivery
Rezone at 810 East 800 South
- Council action
Approved: Rezone and master plan amendment at 810 East 800 South · Approved minutes Record → · July 20, 2021
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
July 20, 2021 · City Council
Rezone and master plan amendment at 810 East 800 South
Approved · 7-0
The Council adopted Ordinance 40 of 2021 rezoning the parcel from R-2 to CB and amending the Central Community land use map to Community Commercial.
July 13, 2021 · City Council
Rezone and master plan amendment at 810 East 800 South
Continued · 6-0
The proposal would rezone a parcel from R-2 (Single- and Two-Family Residential) to CB (Community Business) and change the Central Community land use map from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial. Preliminary plans show a two-story building with commercial space downstairs, residential units upstairs and rear parking. One speaker opposed it, saying it would extend poor zoning created by the Smith's expansion and that newer zones should be used. A second speaker said staff reports should be simpler and that developer contributions to Council campaigns should be disclosed. The applicant described how the zone was chosen, said he had contributed to Council Member Mano's campaign, and described the project's benefits. The Council closed the hearing and deferred action.
- Applicant: the applicant
- Current zone → proposed: R-2 → CB
- Petitions: PLNPCM2020-00740 and 00741