Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Logan development tracker

Water Conservation Plan (Resolution 21-52)

State-required plan that reports water use falling to 175 gallons per person a day and about 25 percent system loss, with goals for pipe replacement and a secondary irrigation system. Approved December 7, 2021.

Approved

Type
Public project
Location
Citywide
Applicant
City of Logan Water Department

In brief

Water Conservation Plan (Resolution 21-52) appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of December 7, 2021.

On record, it was approved once.

The most recent decision was approved (5-0) at the City Council meeting of December 7, 2021.

Follow the money and project delivery

Water Conservation Plan (Resolution 21-52)

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved: Water Conservation Plan, Resolution 21-52 · Approved minutes Record → · Dec. 7, 2021

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. December 7, 2021 · City Council

    Water Conservation Plan, Resolution 21-52

    Approved · 5-0

    Water and Wastewater Manager Cameron Draney presented the state-required plan: use fell from over 400 gallons per person a day in 1992 to 175 in 2020, and about 25 percent of delivered water is still lost to leaks and unaccounted use. New goals include pipe replacement, a water audit and a multi-city pressurized secondary irrigation system. The council approved it on a roll call of five ayes.

    Moved by Council Member Tom Jensen, seconded by Council Member Mark Anderson. Vote: 5-0; the minutes say the motion carried unanimously, counted here as the 5 council members present