Published by Paul Ivinskas
Wednesday, October 21, 2026
Our mission

Help Utahns understand their communities and hold government accountable. Through nonpartisan, AI-assisted research, we examine public records, follow decisions and votes, and connect readers with local news, events and places.

Everything Utah, every day.

Saratoga Springs development tracker

Andover rezone and development agreement

Rezone from Agricultural to R1-9 with a development agreement, adopted Sept. 15, 2026 as Ordinance 26-41. The approval is conditioned: the agreement's provisions about an additional parcel take effect only after the city approves that parcel's annexation and it is within city limits. The rezone did not annex the parcel, and the records reviewed do not show a later annexation or construction.

Where it stands
Approved
Type
Zone change
Location
Northeast of Pony Express Parkway and Clark Drive
Follow the money and project delivery

Andover rezone and development agreement

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved with conditions: Ordinance 26-41: Andover rezone, Agricultural to R1-9, and development agreement · Approved minutes Record → · Sept. 15, 2026

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. September 15, 2026 · City Council

    Ordinance 26-41: Andover rezone, Agricultural to R1-9, and development agreement

    Approved with conditions · 4-0

    The council rezoned the Andover property northeast of Pony Express Parkway and Clark Drive from Agricultural to R1-9. It added a condition that the development agreement's annexation-related provisions take effect only after the city approves the annexation of an additional parcel and that land is within city limits. The proposed annexation parcel was separate from the rezone, and this vote did not annex it. The city recorder's Sept. 16 notice confirms adoption.

    • Current zone to proposed: Agricultural to R1-9
    • Conditions: staff-report findings and conditions, plus the annexation prerequisite described above
    • Status limit: the minutes do not show a later annexation or construction

    Moved by Councilmember Barton, seconded by Councilmember Taylor. Vote: 4-0; Council Member Edon Davenport absent

Saved on this device. Statewide news and alerts remain available.