Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Saratoga Springs development tracker

Andover rezone and development agreement

Rezone from Agricultural to R1-9 with a development agreement, adopted Sept. 15, 2026 as Ordinance 26-41. The approval is conditioned: the agreement's provisions about an additional parcel take effect only after the city approves that parcel's annexation and it is within city limits. The rezone did not annex the parcel, and the records reviewed do not show a later annexation or construction.

Approved

Type
Zone change
Location
Northeast of Pony Express Parkway and Clark Drive

In brief

Andover rezone and development agreement appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of September 15, 2026.

On record, it was approved with conditions once.

The most recent decision was approved with conditions (4-0) at the City Council meeting of September 15, 2026.

Follow the money and project delivery

Andover rezone and development agreement

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved with conditions: Ordinance 26-41: Andover rezone, Agricultural to R1-9, and development agreement · Approved minutes Record → · Sept. 15, 2026

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. September 15, 2026 · City Council

    Ordinance 26-41: Andover rezone, Agricultural to R1-9, and development agreement

    Approved with conditions · 4-0

    The council rezoned the Andover property northeast of Pony Express Parkway and Clark Drive from Agricultural to R1-9. It added a condition that the development agreement's annexation-related provisions take effect only after the city approves the annexation of an additional parcel and that land is within city limits. The proposed annexation parcel was separate from the rezone, and this vote did not annex it. The city recorder's Sept. 16 notice confirms adoption.

    • Current zone to proposed: Agricultural to R1-9
    • Conditions: staff-report findings and conditions, plus the annexation prerequisite described above
    • Status limit: the minutes do not show a later annexation or construction

    Moved by Councilmember Barton, seconded by Councilmember Taylor. Vote: 4-0; Council Member Edon Davenport absent