Utah, on the record.
Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →
Development, roads, public projects and policy proposals before Saratoga Springs’s Planning Commission and City Council, with every hearing and vote. 2 are still being decided.
Saratoga Springs tracks 8 projects through its Planning Commission and City Council.
By where they stand: approved (6), proposed (1), and in review (1).
By type: site plan (3), annexation (2), zone change (2), and development agreement (1).
Annexation
Proposed
On Oct. 6, 2026 the Saratoga Springs City Council approved Resolution R26-50 stating its intent to annex a city-owned parcel that forms part of an unincorporated Utah County island or peninsula next to the city. A public hearing is set for Nov. 10, 2026. The council will annex unless owners of a majority of the private land, worth at least half the area's value, protest in writing by the hearing.
Annexation
In review
The council approved a resolution of intent to annex the Andover property on Oct. 6, 2026, 4-0, and amended the Annexation Policy Plan to include the parcel. That is a preliminary step: a public hearing on the notice of intent to annex is set for Nov. 10, 2026, and the annexation itself has not been completed.
Site plan
Approved
A Rocky Mountain Power substation site plan and a related change to the utility fencing rules on West Village Parkway. On Oct. 6, 2026 the council approved both, 4-0, per its signed minutes: the code change allows utility fences and walls up to ten feet, and the site plan covers about 0.89 acre of a 5.25-acre parcel. Approval does not show construction or operation.
Zone change
Approved
A general plan amendment from Low Density Residential to Institutional/Civic and a rezone from Planned Community to Institutional/Civic for a seminary site (Ordinance 26-45), approved by the council on its Oct. 6, 2026 consent calendar, 4-0. Approval of a zoning change is not a construction or opening date.
Development agreement
Approved
St. John Properties is planning Spring Heights II, a mix of office, retail and flex buildings at about 2300 North Redwood Road, following its Spring Heights I development. It needed three approvals: a general plan change from Business Park to Regional Commercial and Light Industrial, a rezone from Agricultural to the same two zones, and a development agreement. Draft minutes say the council approved all three 4-0 on Oct. 6 with one member absent, and the city recorder's Oct. 7 notice confirms Ordinance 26-46 was adopted. The agreement requires burying the overhead power lines along Redwood Road, piping and burying the canal, and building a trail along the western edge. The applicant said the flex buildings would be 24 feet tall, set about 15 feet below existing grade. One council member noted the zone allows 40 feet and asked about noise from possible light manufacturing, and another noted the change lowers the top height from 75 feet under Business Park and adds setbacks. The agreement itself does not set height. The minutes are still draft, and a signed agreement, site plans and a construction schedule are not in the posted record.
Zone change
Approved
Rezone from Agricultural to R1-9 with a development agreement, adopted Sept. 15, 2026 as Ordinance 26-41. The approval is conditioned: the agreement's provisions about an additional parcel take effect only after the city approves that parcel's annexation and it is within city limits. The rezone did not annex the parcel, and the records reviewed do not show a later annexation or construction.
Site plan
Approved
Redwood Medical is the last piece of a commercial development at 1843 North Redwood Road that is zoned Mixed-Use. The council approved its preliminary plat and site plan on Sept. 15, 4-0 with one member absent, on the staff report's findings and conditions. The plan has four lots and two commercial buildings: a 30-foot building on Lot 1 intended for take-out restaurants, medical offices and retail, and a 40-foot building on Lot 2 with a flagpole that may bring it to 45 feet. Housing is not proposed and is barred by the development agreement from the earlier rezone. The east entrance is right-in, right-out only, and the applicant said the traffic study showed the extra buildings would not add much. The applicant told the council he had no tenants yet. A council member confirmed these were the only buildings left to finish. The adoption notice the city posted the next day covers two other ordinances (the Andover rezone and accessory dwelling rules), not this administrative approval. Permits, construction and opening are not shown in the record.
Site plan
Approved
SCI Wasatch Lawn proposes a funeral home at 877 West Peony Drive, in Village Plan 2 of the Wildflower Planned Community, on land designated for commercial use and subject to the Community Commercial zone's rules. The council approved its preliminary plat and site plan on Sept. 15, 4-0 with one member absent, using the staff report's findings and conditions. Two council members thanked the company for coming and said the city needed the service. The mayor wanted to be sure city code requires enough parking for this kind of building in the future, and a council member asked staff to check whether the driveway approaches could affect parking on Peony Drive; the planning director said the street frontage is striped as no parking. A company representative explained that funeral homes plan around expected attendance and move services to churches or schools when a crowd is too large. The minutes do not establish permits, construction or an opening date, and the city's adoption notice from Sept. 16 does not cover this item.
Find a street or project, open its reported location on a map, then read its decisions and conditions. Address searches are approximate locations, not parcel boundaries.