Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Orem development tracker

Residential building height limits ordinance

Amendment to Article 22-6-8 lowering base heights to 30 feet (pitched) and 20 feet (flat) with setback-based increases and a 45-degree height envelope, after a flat-roofed house prompted complaints. Approved unanimously April 28, 2026.

Approved

Type
Code change
Applicant
City of Orem
Location
Single-family residential zones citywide

In brief

Residential building height limits ordinance appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of April 28, 2026.

On record, it was approved once.

The most recent decision was approved (6-0) at the City Council meeting of April 28, 2026.

Follow the money and project delivery

Residential building height limits ordinance

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved: Public hearing: building height limits in single-family zones (Article 22-6-8) · Approved minutes Record → · April 28, 2026

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. April 28, 2026 · City Council

    Public hearing: building height limits in single-family zones (Article 22-6-8)

    Approved · 7-0 with the mayor

    Planning Manager Jared Hall presented an ordinance lowering the base height to 30 feet for pitched roofs and 20 feet for flat roofs at minimum setbacks, with one extra foot of height allowed for each extra foot of setback up to 35 feet (pitched) and 24 feet (flat), plus a graduated height envelope sloping inward at 45 degrees from a point 8 feet above grade at the property line, with exceptions for gables and dormers. Hall said artificial grade elevation would be addressed separately. Council Member Mecham said the Planning Commission was universally in favor. No one spoke at the hearing.

    Moved by Council Member Chris Killpack, seconded by Council Member LaNae Millett. Vote: 6-0; Mayor McCandless also voted yes