Sensitive Area Overlay Zone enforcement and penalties
Title 21 amendments on violations, enforcement and penalties in the Sensitive Area Overlay Zone. The Planning Commission recommended approval and the council adopted Ordinance 23-18 (Option 2) on Oct. 3, 2023.
Approved
- Type
- Code change
- Location
- Citywide
- Applicant
- Sandy Community Development
- City Council: Sensitive Area Overlay Zone violations, enforcement and penalties (Ordinance 23-18)
- City Council: Title 21 Sensitive Area Overlay Zone: violations, enforcement and penalties
In brief
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone enforcement and penalties appears on 2 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of September 26, 2023 to the City Council meeting of October 3, 2023.
On record, it was approved once.
The most recent decision was approved at the City Council meeting of October 3, 2023.
Follow the money and project delivery
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone enforcement and penalties
- Council action
Approved: Sensitive Area Overlay Zone violations, enforcement and penalties (Ordinance 23-18) · Approved minutes Record → · Oct. 3, 2023
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
October 3, 2023 · City Council
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone violations, enforcement and penalties (Ordinance 23-18)
Approved
Zoning Administrator Melissa Anderson presented two options. The council adopted Option 2, adding Section 7 to Title 21 Chapter 15. No one spoke at the hearing. The notes give no tally.
September 26, 2023 · City Council
Title 21 Sensitive Area Overlay Zone: violations, enforcement and penalties
Discussed
Zoning Administrator Melissa Anderson presented; the Planning Commission recommended approval. Mike Wilcox and Community Development Director James Sorenson answered questions. The item was set to return for action.