Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Salt Lake City development tracker

Stealth wireless tower height amendment

Raises the height limit for stealth wireless facilities in the PL zone from 35 to 75 feet, prompted by a proposed tower at the Pioneer Police Precinct. Adopted 5-1 as Ordinance 73 of 2022 on Nov. 10, 2022 despite a negative Planning Commission recommendation.

Approved

Type
Code change
Location
Public Lands zone citywide

In brief

Stealth wireless tower height amendment appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of November 10, 2022.

On record, it was approved once.

The most recent decision was approved (5-1) at the City Council meeting of November 10, 2022, with Council Member Darin Mano voting no.

Follow the money and project delivery

Stealth wireless tower height amendment

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved: Stealth wireless tower height text amendment · Approved minutes Record → · Nov. 10, 2022

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. November 10, 2022 · City Council

    Stealth wireless tower height text amendment

    Approved · 5-1

    The Council adopted Ordinance 73 of 2022 allowing stealth wireless telecommunication facilities up to 75 feet, instead of 35 feet, in the Public Lands zone citywide. The request stems from a proposed stealth cellular tower at the Pioneer Police Precinct at 1040 West 700 South (Petition PLNPCM2020-00284). The Planning Commission had forwarded a negative recommendation. Council Member Mano, who voted no, said his opposition was because of the stealth aspect of the towers.

    • Planning Commission: negative recommendation

    Moved by Council Member Petro, seconded by Council Member Dugan. Vote: 5-1; Council Member Darin Mano voted no