Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Salt Lake City development tracker

Recurring nuisance properties ordinance

Title 11 changes creating an administrative process against owners who fail to curb persistent nuisance activity on their properties, mainly commercial. Adopted March 24 as Ordinance 13 of 2026.

Approved

Type
Code change
Applicant
Salt Lake City
  1. Mar 24, 2026City Council: Recurring nuisance properties ordinance
  2. Mar 10, 2026City Council: Recurring nuisance properties ordinance
  3. Feb 17, 2026City Council: Consent agenda
  4. Feb 17, 2026City Council work session: Recurring nuisance properties ordinance follow-up

In brief

Recurring nuisance properties ordinance appears on 4 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of February 17, 2026 to the City Council meeting of March 24, 2026.

On record, it was approved 2 times and continued once.

The most recent decision was approved (7-0) at the City Council meeting of March 24, 2026.

Follow the money and project delivery

Recurring nuisance properties ordinance

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved: Recurring nuisance properties ordinance · Approved minutes Record → · March 24, 2026

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. March 24, 2026 · City Council

    Recurring nuisance properties ordinance

    Approved · 7-0

    The council adopted Ordinance 13 of 2026 amending Title 11 on nuisance private property. Council Member Eva Lopez Chavez thanked Council Members Puy and Wharton and former Council Member Mano for crafting a policy that supports businesses while closing loopholes.

    Moved by Council Member Erika Carlsen, seconded by Council Member Victoria Petro. Vote: 7-0

  2. March 10, 2026 · City Council

    Recurring nuisance properties ordinance

    Continued · 7-0

    Two speakers opposed the ordinance, one warning it could be used against University of Utah students and another saying issues belong between neighbors; others supported it to address loud late-night gatherings near the university. Council Member Lopez Chavez said Ordinance 49 of 2025 already defined unruly gatherings and owner liability, and that this ordinance removed the 2 a.m. alcohol restriction and clarified business liability, with noise handled elsewhere. Council Member Puy said it targets commercial businesses. Action was deferred.

    • Amends Title 11 of the city code

    Moved by Council Member Daniel Dugan, seconded by Council Member Alejandro Puy. Vote: 7-0

  3. February 17, 2026 · City Council

    Consent agenda

    Approved · 7-0

    The council approved the consent agenda: setting Mar. 10 hearings on the Rio Grande rezone, the fence and hedge text amendment, the 527-539 South 400 East rezone and the recurring nuisance properties ordinance; Grant Holding Account Items (Batch No. 2); appointing Anna Sullivan to the Planning Commission; and reappointing Matthew Coles to the Arts Council.

    Moved by Council Member Chris Wharton, seconded by Council Member Alejandro Puy. Vote: 7-0

  4. February 17, 2026 · City Council work session

    Recurring nuisance properties ordinance follow-up

    Discussed

    Arturo Garcia presented a revised 'responsible owner' ordinance that removed a previously considered alcohol consumption provision and now sets an administrative process for identifying and enforcing against nuisances, with safeguards against misuse. Staff said it applies mainly to business properties but could apply to residential properties involving litter or illegal activity, that owners can cure problems through an abatement plan, and that other cities use similar processes. Council Member Chris Wharton asked for a list of defined nuisances.

    • Timeline: hearing Mar. 10; tentative action Mar. 24