Pioneer Park improvements (Your Downtown Park)
Conceptual design to guide future Pioneer Park improvements, preliminarily estimated at $20 million, led by Public Lands with consultant Design Workshop. The Council heard it Feb. 15, 2022; some members raised historic-character and tree concerns, and the plan was to go to the Historic Landmark Commission.
In review
- Type
- Public project
- Location
- Pioneer Park, Downtown Salt Lake City
In brief
Pioneer Park improvements (Your Downtown Park) appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council work session meeting of February 15, 2022.
Follow the money and project delivery
Pioneer Park improvements (Your Downtown Park)
- Council action
No approval or denial linked in the records collected.
- Money in the record
contract: amount not given — Consultant for Pioneer Park conceptual design; budget: $20.0 million — Preliminary cost estimate for Pioneer Park improvements Record → · Feb. 15, 2022
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
February 15, 2022 · City Council work session
Pioneer Park improvements: 'Your Downtown Park' conceptual design
Discussed
Public Lands staff and consultant Design Workshop presented the conceptual design, preliminarily estimated at $20 million, based on public surveys and a park audit. Council Member Petro-Eschler said the design would harm the park's historic character and questioned removing trees for sight lines; staff said the plan would go to the Historic Landmark Commission and that open sight lines and activity support safety. Council Member Mano asked whether the plan was a master plan and whether the funds might go to other park space; staff said it is a site plan and construction depends on funding. Valdemoros called it compelling, Puy asked for a citywide view of park investment, and Dugan and Fowler asked about funding sources and maintenance. State funding was not approved.