Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Thursday, November 5, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Holladay development tracker

2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road rezone

Rezone of about 0.49 acre from RM to PO for an office expansion and possible mixed use. Neighbors raised height, privacy, parking and traffic concerns. The council adopted it March 7, 2024 with a development agreement due in 90 days, a 35-foot height limit beyond 55% of parcel depth and setbacks, and approved the development agreement April 25, 2024.

Approved

Type
Zone change
Size
0.49 acres
Location
2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road
  1. Apr 25, 2024City Council: Resolution 2024-14: Development agreement for 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road
  2. Mar 7, 2024City Council: Ordinance 2024-02: Rezone 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road from RM to PO
  3. Feb 1, 2024City Council: Ordinance 2024-02: Rezone 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road from RM to PO
  4. Jan 18, 2024City Council: Public hearing: rezone 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road from RM to PO (0.49 acre)

In brief

2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road rezone appears on 4 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of January 18, 2024 to the City Council meeting of April 25, 2024.

On record, it was continued 2 times, approved with conditions once, and approved once.

The most recent decision was approved (6-0) at the City Council meeting of April 25, 2024.

Follow the money and project delivery

2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road rezone

Approved

  1. Council action

    Approved: Resolution 2024-14: Development agreement for 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road · Approved minutes Record → · April 25, 2024

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. April 25, 2024 · City Council

    Resolution 2024-14: Development agreement for 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road

    Approved · 6-0

    Approves the development agreement required as a condition of the March 7 rezone.

    Moved by Council Member Drew Quinn, seconded by Council Member Emily Gray. Vote: 6-0; unanimous

  2. March 7, 2024 · City Council

    Ordinance 2024-02: Rezone 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road from RM to PO

    Approved with conditions · 5-0

    Adopted with conditions: a development agreement within 90 days; building height limited to 35 feet beyond a line at 55% of parcel depth measured from Murray Holladay Road; and setbacks of at least 10 feet on Murray Holladay Road and 20 feet on Sycamore Lane.

    • Current zone → proposed: RM → PO
    • Conditions: development agreement within 90 days; 35-foot height limit beyond 55% depth; setbacks of 10 feet (Murray Holladay Road) and 20 feet (Sycamore)

    Moved by Council Member Paul Fotheringham, seconded by Council Member Ty Brewer. Vote: 5-0; unanimous

  3. February 1, 2024 · City Council

    Ordinance 2024-02: Rezone 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road from RM to PO

    Continued · 6-0

    The council continued the item so development agreement details can be determined. At the hearing, the applicant, an owner of an adjacent duplex speaking for two other nearby owners, and residents spoke; one did not oppose the rezone if conditions were met and others raised traffic and parking or emailed opposition.

    Moved by Council Member Ty Brewer, seconded by Council Member Paul Fotheringham. Vote: 6-0 to continue to March 7

  4. January 18, 2024 · City Council

    Public hearing: rezone 2051 and 2061 East Murray Holladay Road from RM to PO (0.49 acre)

    Continued

    Eight emailed comments were generally opposed. Speakers raised building height, privacy, parking, traffic and pedestrian safety. The applicant described plans for an office expansion and possible mixed use. The hearing stayed open. In the work meeting the council discussed walkability, setbacks (20 feet in RM, 30 feet in PO), height limits, traffic on Sycamore Lane and whether mixed use would need a conditional use permit; the mayor said he had not decided.

    • Acres: 0.49
    • Current zone → proposed: RM → PO