12430 S. 700 East rezone and development agreement
A request to rezone 1.67 acres from RA1 and RA2 to R4 for a five-lot development on a private road, plus a related development agreement. The Planning Commission considered the rezone July 9, 2026 and forwarded a positive recommendation, but on Aug. 4 the council's motion to approve Ordinance 1735 failed 2-3 and the item was continued to a date uncertain. A Planning Commission hearing on the development agreement was noticed for Oct. 22 at 6:30 p.m.; the city's Oct. 8 notice now says the item will be continued to a date uncertain. A continuation is not a denial.
- Where it stands
- Tabled
- Type
- Development agreement
- Status evidence date
- Thu, Oct 8
- Location
- About 12430 S. 700 East, Draper
- Size
- 1.67 acres
- Homes
- 5
Updates
October 22, 2026
The Oct. 22 Planning Commission agenda marks this item continued to a date uncertain. A continuation is not a denial, and no new date is set. Source
October 8, 2026
The city posted notice of an Oct. 22 Planning Commission hearing on a development agreement; the notice now states the item will be continued to a date uncertain. Source
Follow the money and project delivery
12430 S. 700 East rezone and development agreement
- Council action
Tabled according to the dated project source. Record → · Oct. 8, 2026
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
August 4, 2026 · City Council
Ordinance 1735: rezone of 1.67 acres at about 12430 S. 700 East, RA1 and RA2 to R4
Continued · 5-0
Planning Manager Todd Draper presented a request to rezone 1.67 acres from RA1 and RA2 to R4, saying a five-lot subdivision could follow and that the Planning Commission forwarded a positive recommendation. After a public hearing at which no one came forward, a motion to approve the ordinance failed 2-3. The council then voted 5-0 to continue the item to a date uncertain for further discussion.
- Motion to approve failed 2-3: Fred Lowry and Kathryn Dahlin voted yes; Mike Green, Bryn Heather Johnson and Tasha Lowery voted no
- Approval motion by Council Member Lowry, seconded by Council Member Dahlin