Covered parking on historic landmark properties
City code amendment on covered parking structures on historic landmark properties. Continued June 3, 2025 and passed 7-0 on June 17, 2025.
Approved
- Type
- Code change
- City Council: Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties
- City Council work session: Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties
- City Council: Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties
In brief
Covered parking on historic landmark properties appears on 3 recorded agendas, from the City Council meeting of June 3, 2025 to the City Council work session meeting of June 17, 2025.
On record, it was continued once and approved once.
The most recent decision was approved (7-0) at the City Council meeting of June 17, 2025.
Follow the money and project delivery
Covered parking on historic landmark properties
- Council action
Approved: Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties · Agenda and reports Record → · June 17, 2025
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
June 17, 2025 · City Council
Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties
Approved · 7-0
The council amended city code on covered parking structures on historic landmark properties. An earlier hearing on the item had been continued on June 3.
- Case: PLOTA20250179
June 17, 2025 · City Council work session
Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties
Discussed
Preview of the code amendment, heard that evening.
June 3, 2025 · City Council
Covered parking structures on historic landmark properties
Continued
An ordinance amending city code on covered parking structures on historic landmark properties was continued. It passed at the next meeting.
- Case: PLOTA20250179