Provo council rejects 151-acre North Timpview General Plan change 0-7
February 4, 2020, 5:30 p.m. · 351 W. Center Street, Provo
The council voted 0-7 against changing the General Plan designation of about 151 acres in the North Timpview Neighborhood from Agricultural to Residential. It voted 7-0 to send a Foothills parking-restriction request to the City Parking Coordinator and continued a research and business park zoning amendment to February 18.
From the agenda and city or news reports of the results; minutes not yet posted. Updated October 14, 2026.
Decisions at a glance
Agenda, item by item
Item 1 · Presentation
Citizen Connect presentation
Discussed
The item was a presentation only; the Summary of Action records no vote.
Item 2 · City code
Research and Business Park zone: floor area ratio, setback and buffer yard rules
Continued
An ordinance amending requirements in the Research and Business Park zone was continued to the February 18 council meeting.
- Case: PLOTA20190425
Item 3 · General plan
General Plan change for 151 acres, 300 E.-1000 E. and 4800 N.-6000 N., Agricultural to Residential
Denied · 0-7
The implied motion to approve the ordinance failed 0-7. The Summary of Action does not list the individual voters or give reasons.
- Acres: about 151
- Current designation → proposed: Agricultural → Residential
- Case: PLGPA20190352
Item 4 · Public hearing
Public hearing on extending Foothills Permit Parking area restrictions
Approved · 7-0
After the public hearing, a motion to send the request to the City Parking Coordinator for further review was approved 7-0.
Item 5 · Zoning
General Plan / zone changes for R2.5, R3 and R4 properties
Continued
Listed as continued.
- Case: PLOTA20190427
Item 6 · City code
Removal of R2.5, R3, R4, R5 and Campus High Density zones from code
Continued
Listed as continued. The zones are in Provo City Code chapters 14.12, 14.12A, 14.13, 14.14 and 14.14D.
- Case: PLOTA20190428
Item 7 · City code
Sign ordinance clarification (14.38.120-140)
Continued
The Sign Ordinance Committee's request to clarify sign size requirements was listed as continued.
- Case: PLOTA20190409