Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Park City · City Council

Council asks for parking cost and traffic analysis on Bonanza 5-acre plan

September 24, 2025

In a second work session on the Bonanza 5-acre site the council reviewed a 112-unit "Mountain Town Village" with a village green and a garage costing $21.7 million for one level or $44.4 million for two. It asked for a parking cost recovery analysis, traffic data and a solar study. No votes were taken.

From the approved minutes. Updated October 14, 2026.

In brief

1 item came up for a decision or discussion: 1 discussed.

The agenda records 2 dollar amounts, the largest $44.4 million.

1 item here is tracked in the city's development tracker.

This write-up links 3 source documents.

6 members were present.

Residents raised open space versus housing, garage cost, and building height and shade.

The previous City Council meeting was on September 5, 2025: Council majority favors one four-story building at Bonanza 5-acre site

The next one was on September 25, 2025: Council adopts 2025 General Plan 5-0 as amended

Decisions at a glance

Agenda, item by item

  1. Item II.1 · Development

    Bonanza 5-acre site redevelopment: design and strategy preferences (work session)

    Discussed · Bonanza 5-acre site

    The team showed a "Mountain Town Village" with a 1.47-acre village green (the minutes say 1.15), 112 homes, heights of 35 feet on Bonanza and Kearns and 45 feet at the southwest corner, a splash pad and a mobility hub, with construction targeted for fall 2026. Parking costs were about $21,674,120 for one level (300 spaces) and about $44,399,312 for two (554 spaces). Council Member Ciraco was less concerned about adding units because the Holiday Village project provides housing; Council Member Parigian wanted more homes and year-round uses; Council Member Rubell wanted lighter massing and priority for the local workforce; Council Member Toly was unsure about four stories after seeing shadows and found the parking cost very high; Council Member Dickey wanted the city subsidy clarified. Staff will return with a parking cost recovery analysis, traffic data, a three-story solar study, the subsidy amount and a Gordo parking cost comparison. No vote.

    Follow Bonanza Park 5-acre site in the development tracker →

What residents said

Open space versus housingGarage costBuilding height and shade