Highlands Landing North
A petition to change the Future Land Use Map to Medium Density Residential and Community Commercial and rezone 14.07 acres to R-3-8 and SC-2. On Oct. 13 the council voted 4-3 not to approve it.
Denied
- Type
- Zone change
- Location
- About 7592 South 5490 West
- Size
- 14.07 acres
In brief
Highlands Landing North appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of October 13, 2026.
On record, it was denied once.
The most recent decision was denied (3-4) at the City Council meeting of October 13, 2026, with Kent Shelton, Bob Bedore, Zach Jacob voting no.
Follow the money and project delivery
Highlands Landing North
- Council action
Denied: Highlands Landing North: future land use change and rezone of 14.07 acres to R-3-8 and SC-2 · Approved minutes Record → · Oct. 13, 2026
- Money in the record
No itemized amount linked in the records collected.
- Signed agreement and payments
Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.
- Work and operating costs
Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →
Every hearing and vote
October 13, 2026 · City Council
Highlands Landing North: future land use change and rezone of 14.07 acres to R-3-8 and SC-2
Denied · 3-4
Peterson Development's Jeff Seaman presented a concept plan of 67 single-family units at 5.99 units per acre, said parks and open space would be well represented and offered a disclosure with each purchase agreement. The land was designated very low density residential, parks and open space, and community commercial. Staff described protections including the Balanced Housing Ordinance, a three-year reversion clause and a cap on units. Residents spoke in a hearing from 8:17 to 8:29 p.m., raising concerns about density and an earlier retirement-housing approval. Chair Wignall and Council Members Whitelock, Harris and Lamb voted not to approve, citing density and concern about loopholes; Council Member Jacob said his vote against the denial motion was not support for the application and more work was needed.
- Size: 14.07 acres
- Concept: 67 single-family units, 5.99 per acre