Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Sandy · City Council

Sandy council adopts eminent domain special-exception ordinance and starts two road right-of-way annexations, 7-0

June 29, 2021, 5:15 p.m. · Online meeting (Sandy City Council, 10000 Centennial Parkway)

The Sandy City Council voted 7-0 to adopt Ordinance 21-21, letting the Planning Commission grant special exceptions for properties involved in city eminent domain proceedings. Its consent calendar approved the dispatch services agreement and resolutions stating intent to annex road rights-of-way along Creek Road and Highland Drive.

From the approved minutes. Updated October 14, 2026.

In brief

5 items came up for a decision or discussion: 4 approved and 1 discussed.

The agenda records 1 dollar amount, the largest $769,000.

2 items here are tracked in the city's development tracker.

This write-up links 3 source documents.

7 members were present.

Residents raised eminent domain, juneteenth observance, and water use.

The previous City Council meeting was on June 22, 2021: Sandy council extends fireworks restrictions to all areas east of 1300 East, 7-0

The next one was on July 13, 2021: Sandy council elects Alison Stroud chair and Cyndi Sharkey vice chair; keeps candidate disclosure rules unchanged, 4-3

Decisions at a glance

Agenda, item by item

  1. Item 1 · Budget

    Sales tax and budget update

    Discussed

    Brett Neuman said April sales tax distributions were $769,000 above budgeted projections. The council supported the city's conservative budgeting. No vote was taken.

    • Budget$769,000 April sales tax distributions above budgeted projections. Paid from Sales tax
  2. Item 4 · Contract

    Amended interlocal agreement for dispatch (CAD) and records (RMS) services (Resolution 21-30C)

    Approved · 7-0

    Approved on the consent calendar. The cost and terms were described at the June 22 work session as about $600,000 per year with a 7.12% annual increase on new charges only.

    Moved by Council Member Brooke Christensen, seconded by Council Member Zach Robinson. Vote: unanimous voice vote on the consent calendar

  3. Item 5 · Annexation

    Intent to annex Creek Road right-of-way (Resolution 21-29C, ANX060820)

    Approved · 7-0 · South half-width of Creek Road, west to Union Park Avenue

    The resolution states the city's intent to annex an unincorporated section of Creek Road right-of-way, south half-width, extending west to Union Park Avenue. It sets a public hearing and directs publication of notice.

    Moved by Council Member Brooke Christensen, seconded by Council Member Zach Robinson. Vote: unanimous voice vote on the consent calendar

    Follow Creek Road and Highland Drive right-of-way annexation in the development tracker →

  4. Item 6 · Annexation

    Intent to annex Highland Drive right-of-way (Resolution 21-28C, ANX060820)

    Approved · 7-0 · Highland Drive east through Rossett Green Lane

    The resolution states the city's intent to annex an unincorporated road right-of-way along Highland Drive extending east through Rossett Green Lane. It sets a public hearing and directs publication of notice.

    Moved by Council Member Brooke Christensen, seconded by Council Member Zach Robinson. Vote: unanimous voice vote on the consent calendar

    Follow Creek Road and Highland Drive right-of-way annexation in the development tracker →

  5. Item 7 · City code

    Effects of eminent domain proceedings: amendment to Title 21, Chapter 2 (Ordinance 21-21)

    Approved · 7-0

    Mike Wilcox presented the amendment for Public Works. It allows the Planning Commission to grant special exceptions for properties involved in city eminent domain proceedings or negotiations. Staff recommended approval. Steve Van Maren said he had no objection but asked to see the Planning Commission minutes.

    Moved by Council Member Monica Zoltanski, seconded by Council Member Zach Robinson. Vote: 7-0

    Follow Eminent domain special exceptions (Title 21, Chapter 2) in the development tracker →

What residents said

Eminent domainJuneteenth observanceWater use

Steve Van Maren asked to see the Planning Commission minutes on the eminent domain ordinance, opposed observing Juneteenth as a county holiday and suggested other dates.