Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Salt Lake City development tracker

Household occupancy (family definition) zoning change

Update to the zoning definition of family to raise or eliminate the cap on unrelated people living together. A Dec. 2, 2025 straw poll favored removing the cap, with possible enforcement tools.

In review

Type
Code change
Location
Citywide
Applicant
Salt Lake City Council

In brief

Household occupancy (family definition) zoning change appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council work session meeting of December 2, 2025.

Follow the money and project delivery

Household occupancy (family definition) zoning change

In review

  1. Council action

    No approval or denial linked in the records collected.

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. December 2, 2025 · City Council work session

    Household occupancy definitions in zoning code

    Discussed · 5-0

    Planning staff presented three options for the zoning definition of family: keep the definition but raise the unrelated-occupant limit to five; raise it to five and allow combinations of family types; or remove the occupant limit entirely. Members discussed tying limits to bedrooms or bathrooms rather than head count. In a straw poll, all members present supported Option 3, removing the limit, with the stipulation that enforcement tools be considered to avoid overcrowding. Council Members Young and Lopez Chavez had not yet arrived.

    • Option 3: remove occupant limit, no distinction between related and unrelated people

    Vote: Straw poll: all five members present supported Option 3