Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Tuesday, November 10, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

North Salt Lake development tracker

Pacific Avenue sidepath

An 8-foot sidepath south of Pacific Avenue from Main Street to Overland Road. The council approved an interlocal agreement with Davis County and matching funds on Oct. 6, 2026. Staff put the cost at $575,000, with $460,000 from county transportation funding and a $115,000 local match, and said construction was already under way. Execution of the agreement and reimbursement are not shown.

Under constructionStatus as of Oct 6, 2026

Type
Public project
Location
Pacific Avenue

In brief

Pacific Avenue sidepath appears on one recorded agenda: the City Council meeting of October 6, 2026.

On record, it was approved once.

The most recent decision was approved (5-0) at the City Council meeting of October 6, 2026.

Follow the money and project delivery

Pacific Avenue sidepath

Under construction

  1. Council action

    Under construction according to the dated project source. Record → · Oct. 6, 2026

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. October 6, 2026 · City Council

    Resolution 2026-48R: Pacific Avenue sidepath interlocal agreement with Davis County

    Approved · 5-0

    Approved an interlocal agreement with Davis County for the Pacific Avenue sidepath using the fourth-quarter county option sales tax for highways or public transit, and authorized matching funds.

    Consent agenda, moved by Councilmember Knowlton, seconded by Councilmember Van Langeveld. Vote: 5-0 by roll call