Rise project area: two tie-breaking votes and a $1.8 million projection
Pleasant View's redevelopment agency adopted the Rise Community Reinvestment Area in January on the mayor's tie-breaking vote, and the council approved the city's participation the same way in August. The project budget projects $1,773,017 for the agency over 15 years; it is a projection, not a payment.
Continuing story: Auditing Pleasant View
Pleasant View's redevelopment agency board adopted the Rise Community Reinvestment Area plan and its budget on Jan. 27, 2026. Both resolutions passed 3-2 on Mayor Steve Gibson's tie-breaking vote. [1]
Board members Sara Urry and Sean Wilkinson voted yes, and Ann Arrington and David Marriott voted no, on Resolutions 2026-A(RDA) and 2026-B(RDA). Johnny Ferry declared a conflict of interest and sat in the audience. [1]
What the budget projects
The project area budget, dated December 2025, estimates the 2025 base taxable value at $9,678,000, with property taxes of $103,380 a year. It projects about $3.60 million in additional property taxes over a 15-year term. [2]
It assumes every taxing entity except the Weber Area Dispatch 911 and Emergency Services District contributes 50% of the new taxes for 15 years. On that assumption, the agency would receive $1,773,017. [2]
The budget divides that projected total into $53,191 for administration (3%), $177,302 for affordable housing (10%) and $1,542,525 (87%) for community reinvestment activities such as on-site improvements and site-specific infrastructure. [2]
The agency expected to trigger collections by March 1, 2028, and the budget says it will not trigger the first year of collection after March 1, 2029. [2]
What was said in January
Rob Sant of Urban & Main told the board the project area covers a 21.64-acre parcel occupied by Rise Bakery. He said Pleasant View City would receive about $132,000 over 15 years and the agency about $1.7 million, less administrative costs and the housing set-aside. [1]
Sant said adoption would start negotiations with the county, school district and other entities, each of which must adopt its own agreement, and that adoption does not guarantee revenue. [1]
Supporters cited low risk, job creation and local spending, according to the minutes. Others questioned the benefit to residents and whether a company of Rise's size needed the incentive. [1]
County and city approvals
On March 24, the Weber County Commission voted 3-0 to approve a participation agreement with the agency for the Rise area. The county's economic development director said the agreement follows county policy and had been redrafted after a work session. [3]
On Aug. 11, the city council considered Resolution 2026-X, the city's interlocal agreement with the agency. Sant said the school district, county and fire district had agreed to participate, the project area lasts 15 years, and 50% of new tax revenue goes to the project while existing tax revenue is unaffected. [4]
Sant said the city would give up about $8,000 a year in tax revenue and receive about $14,000 a year through administrative and affordable-housing allocations. He said the participation agreement requires the company to document the jobs it created before receiving benefits. [4]
Wilkinson and Urry voted yes, Arrington and Marriott voted no, and Ferry abstained. Gibson broke the tie in favor, and the resolution passed 3-2 with one abstention. Ferry's conflict with Rise Bakery was read at the start of the meeting. [4]
The budget's figures are projections. No record reviewed shows any tax increment collected for the Rise area or any payment to the company. The 3% administration and 10% housing amounts are portions of the projected agency total, not additions to it.
Sources
- Pleasant View City Redevelopment Agency · Jan. 27, 2026 minutes
- Pleasant View City Redevelopment Agency · Rise Community Reinvestment Area project area budget, December 2025
- Weber County Commission · March 24, 2026 minutes
- Pleasant View City Council · Aug. 11, 2026 minutes
Reporting by The Utah Ledger from the public records above. AI-assisted, checked against those records.