Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Sunday, November 8, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Cedar Fort development tracker

Agricultural recreation, agricultural business and cul-de-sac zoning amendments

Proposed ordinance changes creating an A-REC agricultural recreation zone, expanding agricultural business uses and allowing cul-de-sacs with Planning Commission approval. Draft language is due at the Nov. 10 commission meeting, with a public hearing possibly paired with the Nov. 17 town council meeting.

In review

Type
Code change
Applicant
Town of Cedar Fort

In brief

Agricultural recreation, agricultural business and cul-de-sac zoning amendments appears on one recorded agenda: the Planning Commission work session meeting of October 29, 2026.

Follow the money and project delivery

Agricultural recreation, agricultural business and cul-de-sac zoning amendments

In review

  1. Council action

    No approval or denial linked in the records collected.

  2. Money in the record

    No itemized amount linked in the records collected.

  3. Signed agreement and payments

    Execution and project-level disbursements are not verified by this tracker. They require separate records; meeting approval alone does not establish either.

  4. Work and operating costs

    Check the linked records for completion and recurring operating costs; this tracker does not verify them. Record →

Every hearing and vote

  1. October 29, 2026 · Planning Commission work session

    Zoning amendments: agricultural recreation, agricultural business and cul-de-sacs

    Discussed

    Commissioners favored an A-REC agricultural recreation designation to fix a mismatch between AR-40 and MG-40 on the map and ordinance, allowing cabins and limited recreation where owners supply utilities. They supported expanding agricultural business uses such as agritourism, farm sales and event facilities, and narrowing the agricultural building exemption. They also supported replacing the ban on cul-de-sacs (section 6.3.160(E)) with approval by the commission under road and fire standards. Drafts will be refined for the Nov. 10 meeting. No action.