Thursday, October 15, 2026The Utah Ledger

Everything Utah, every day.

Park City · City Council

Council continues Deer Valley right-of-way vacation petition after public hearing

March 16, 2023, 5:30 p.m. · City Council Chambers, 445 Marsac Avenue

At a special meeting on March 16, 2023 the council held a public hearing on Deer Valley Resort's petition to vacate portions of right-of-way on Deer Valley Drive West and South and dedicate Doe Pass Road to the city, part of the Snow Park Village base area application. Most speakers opposed it, citing traffic; the council voted 4-0 to continue it to a date uncertain, with Council Member Ryan Dickey excused. No action on the merits was taken.

From the approved minutes. Updated October 14, 2026.

Decisions at a glance

Agenda, item by item

  1. Item II.1 · Development

    Deer Valley Development Company petition to vacate right-of-way on Deer Valley Drive

    Continued · 4-0 · Deer Valley Drive West and South; Doe Pass Road

    The resort said the vacation is necessary for a multimodal center with a transit center, restrooms, lockers, bike parking and a bus charging station, and would relocate the resort's front door north, add signals and crosswalks and widen paths and roads, and said traffic impacts would decrease. Mayor Worel said the standard requires findings of good cause and no material injury. Opponents, including homeowner associations and counsel for a condominium association, cited traffic, noise, idling pollution and a lack of compensation; a few speakers supported the pedestrian safety improvements. Staff made no presentation.

    • Applicant: Deer Valley Development Company

    Moved by Council Member Becca Gerber, seconded by Council Member Tana Toly. Vote: 4-0

    Follow Snow Park Village base area and Deer Valley Drive right-of-way vacation in the development tracker →

What residents said

Traffic on Deer Valley DriveNoise and idlingAdequacy of traffic studies

Seventeen speakers opposed or raised concerns about traffic counts predating the Ikon pass, noise, congestion on exit roads, the adequacy of traffic studies and compensation; three supported the vacation citing pedestrian safety and the applicant's responsiveness. Homeowner association letters opposing the petition were attached.