Park City Council retreat day one reviews Vision 2020 priorities, housing, transportation and land use
February 9, 2022, 9:00 a.m. · City Council Chambers, 445 Marsac Avenue
On the first day of its strategic planning retreat, council reviewed the history of Vision 2020 and its four priorities, housing goals including 800 units by 2026, transportation and peak-day traffic management, and the General Plan update. No votes were taken.
From the approved minutes. Updated October 14, 2026.
In brief
This write-up links 3 source documents.
6 members were present.
Residents raised housing and peak-day traffic.
The previous City Council meeting was on February 3, 2022: Park City Council approves Park City Film Studios amended subdivision and 245 Woodside Avenue encroachment agreement
The next one was on February 10, 2022: Park City Council retreat day two covers budget, Arts and Culture District and event fee waivers
Agenda, item by item
Item III · Presentation
Vision 2020, pillars and critical community priorities
Discussed
Staff presented the history of visioning, the 2019 Future iQ survey and the 2021 adoption of four priorities. Council discussed consolidating priorities, simplifying messaging and including small businesses and the ski resorts. No vote.
Item V.1 · Presentation
Community housing
Discussed
Staff reviewed the housing task force, the 800-unit goal by 2026 and the Woodside Park and Homestake projects. Council discussed fee-in-lieu policy, a regional housing authority, a housing emergency fund and nightly rental policy. The city-owned parcel at 100 Marsac was deprioritized for housing because of steep terrain and neighbor feedback. No vote.
Item V.2 · Presentation
Transportation
Discussed
Staff reviewed capital projects, transit solutions and peak-day traffic management including a temporary resort plan. Council discussed parking studies, resort responsibility and a possible transportation board. No vote.
Item V.3 · Presentation
Planning and land use
Discussed
Staff described the General Plan update, possibly two or more years with a consultant. Council discussed a possible moratorium, historic home protections and regional growth. No vote.
What residents said
HousingPeak-day traffic