Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Saturday, November 7, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Continuing story · Mount Pleasant: audit findings, redevelopment fund and utility loans · all updates, newest first →

Mount Pleasant: audit findings, redevelopment fund and utility loans · From the records

Mount Pleasant's redevelopment fund spent $918,632 in fiscal 2025, leaving $81,330

The audit shows the city's redevelopment agency fund took in $327,521, spent $918,632 and ended fiscal 2025 with $81,330, down from $622,441. It received $225,617 of the $690,766 in intergovernmental revenue in its final budget.

AI-generated illustration: a regional landscape with the name Mount Pleasant, Utah, and The Utah Ledger in type
AI-generated illustration: The Utah Ledger · Original graphic · The Utah Ledger

Continuing storyMount Pleasant: audit findings, redevelopment fund and utility loans

Mount Pleasant

Mount Pleasant's redevelopment agency fund ended fiscal 2025 with an $81,330 balance, down from $622,441 a year earlier, according to the city's audited financial statements. [1]

The agency's governing body is the same as the city's, so the audit reports its finances as part of the city. [5]

Budget and actual

The fund's original fiscal 2025 budget planned $100,000 in revenue and $73,430 in spending. The final budget raised those to $801,176 and $836,466, including $690,766 of intergovernmental revenue and $728,377 for parks, recreation and public property. [2]

Actual revenue was $327,521: $225,617 in intergovernmental revenue, $82,183 in charges for services and $19,720 in interest. Actual spending was $918,632: $102,110 in general government and $816,521 in parks, recreation and public property. [2]

The fund also received a $50,000 transfer from the general fund. Its balance fell by $541,111. [4][1]

The audit lists the spending over the final budget as a compliance finding. Management's response attributes it to "a significant unexpected transaction in the RDA that came in after year-end." [6]

State-required disclosures

In a note required by the state, the agency reports no tax increment, no outstanding bonds or loans, $901,502 spent on site improvements and nothing spent on low-income housing assistance for fiscal 2025. [3]

At June 30, 2025, the fund held $180,279 in receivables and no cash, and owed $90,530 in accounts payable and $8,420 to other city funds. Its remaining balance is committed for the redevelopment agency. [1]

Figures are for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Budget figures are the fund's original and final fiscal 2025 budgets as reported in the audit. The fund balance figures are not current balances.

Sources

6 cited, none of them a government record. Paragraphs carry [n] links to their sources.

  1. Mt. Pleasant City · FY2025 annual financial report (Larson & Company, Dec. 3, 2025; Utah State Auditor filing), governmental funds balance sheet storage.googleapis.com
  2. Mt. Pleasant City · FY2025 annual financial report (Larson & Company, Dec. 3, 2025; Utah State Auditor filing), redevelopment agency fund budget and actual storage.googleapis.com
  3. Mt. Pleasant City · FY2025 annual financial report (Larson & Company, Dec. 3, 2025; Utah State Auditor filing), redevelopment agency note storage.googleapis.com
  4. Mt. Pleasant City · FY2025 annual financial report (Larson & Company, Dec. 3, 2025; Utah State Auditor filing), governmental funds statement of revenues and expenditures storage.googleapis.com
  5. Mt. Pleasant City · FY2025 annual financial report (Larson & Company, Dec. 3, 2025; Utah State Auditor filing), reporting entity note storage.googleapis.com
  6. Mt. Pleasant City · FY2025 annual financial report (Larson & Company, Dec. 3, 2025; Utah State Auditor filing), schedule of findings storage.googleapis.com

Reporting by The Utah Ledger from the public records above. AI-assisted; paragraphs link to their sources.

No corrections or significant updates to this story. Report an error · Corrections log