Friday, October 16, 2026The Utah Ledger

Everything Utah, every day.

Auditing Grantsville · From the records

Grantsville's redevelopment agency spent $558,051 against a $26,000 budget in fiscal 2025

The city's fiscal 2025 audit shows the redevelopment agency fund spent $532,051 more than its budget, and the auditor reported that as the year's one state-compliance finding. The city's later budget lists most of the spending as a $476,869.86 increment payment, without naming who received it.

Published Mountain Time
Source / event date: Fiscal 2025 audit (dated Dec. 30, 2025); Feb. 18, 2026 council minutes; FY2027 final budget

Continuing story: Auditing Grantsville

Grantsville

Grantsville's redevelopment agency fund spent $558,051 in the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2025, against an original and final budget of $26,000, according to the city's audited financial statements. The difference is $532,051. [1]

Ron Stewart of Gilbert & Stewart, the city's auditor, told the council on Feb. 18, 2026 that the city was generally in compliance with state requirements, with one finding: the redevelopment agency fund exceeded its approved budget. The minutes say he recommended closer budget monitoring and amendments when necessary. [2]

What the audit shows

The fund's budget for fiscal 2025 expected $6,500 in interest and no tax revenue, with $19,500 drawn from fund balance. Actual revenue was $753,522: $738,434 in taxes and $15,088 in interest. [1]

After the $558,051 in spending and a $137,720 transfer out to another city fund, the agency's fund balance rose $57,751, from $145,668 to $203,419. [1]

The auditor's opinion on the city's financial statements was not changed by the finding. The minutes say Stewart described a clean opinion and reported no material weaknesses or significant deficiencies. [1][2]

What the budget shows

The city's fiscal 2027 budget file includes a column of fiscal 2025 actual results for the redevelopment agency. It lists $476,869.86 on a line titled "Increment Payment," $62,119.32 for infrastructure, $14,019.09 for salaries, $932.23 for benefits and $4,109.00 for professional and technical services. [3]

Those lines add to $558,049.50, which is $1.50 less than the audited spending total. The budget also lists the $137,720.29 transfer out separately. [3][1]

Neither the budget nor the audit pages reviewed identify who received the increment payment or what obligation it paid. [3][1]

The agency's budget is $56,500 for fiscal 2026 and $55,500 for fiscal 2027, each including $50,000 of expected tax increment. [3]

Spending above an appropriation is a budget-compliance issue. It is not a loss or missing money: the fund took in more than it spent and its balance rose. The Ledger could not read the audit's management letter or the city's written response to the finding in the posted packet.

Sources

  1. Grantsville City · Feb. 18, 2026 council packet, including the fiscal 2025 audit (Gilbert & Stewart, dated Dec. 30, 2025)
  2. Grantsville City Council · Feb. 18, 2026 minutes
  3. Grantsville City · FY2027 final budget (posted July 30, 2026)

Reporting by The Utah Ledger from the public records above. AI-assisted, checked against those records.