Thursday, October 15, 2026TheUtah Ledger

Everything Utah, every day.

Salt Lake City · City Council

Council adopts final 2026-27 budget and property tax increase 7-0 after truth-in-taxation hearing

August 11, 2026, 7:00 p.m.

At a limited formal meeting, the council unanimously adopted the final tax levy and the final fiscal 2026-27 budget, including a property tax rate above the certified rate. Four residents opposed the increase, citing affordability, utility costs and police funding.

From the approved minutes. Updated October 14, 2026.

Decisions at a glance

Agenda, item by item

  1. Item B1-B2 · Budget

    Truth-in-taxation levy and final fiscal year 2026-27 budget

    Approved · 7-0

    After a hearing held as one for both items, the council adopted Ordinance 44 of 2026 setting the final property tax rate for all city funds, including the Library Fund, and Ordinance 45 of 2026 adopting the final fiscal 2026-27 budget, including the property tax increase in the impact schedule. The final budget releases the increase's revenue from the restricted fund created at interim adoption. Four residents spoke against the increase, citing housing and utility costs, the size of the increase and the judgment levy, unclear information for taxpayers, and police funding. Council Member Wharton acknowledged affordability concerns; Council Member Puy cited rising operating costs, resident expectations for services and the department cuts already made. Dollar totals were not restated in the minutes.

    • BudgetAmount not given Final fiscal 2026-27 city budget with property tax rate adjustment above the certified rate. Paid from Property tax

    Ordinance 44: moved by Council Member Dugan, seconded by Council Member Petro. Ordinance 45: moved by Council Member Wharton, seconded by Council Member Dugan. Vote: 7-0

What residents said

Property tax increaseWater ratesPolice fundingHousing affordability

Four residents spoke against the property tax increase, raising rising property taxes and water bills, housing costs for owners and renters, the size of the increase and the judgment levy, lack of clear information for taxpayers, and police funding.