Published by Paul Ivinskas · Politically neutral. No endorsements.
Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Utah, on the record.

Same sections for every candidate. Every fact linked to its source. How we stay neutral →

Utah bill tracker

H.B. 95: Public Employee Gender-specific Language Requirements

2026 General Session · Originating chamber: House

Saved official records and Ledger coverage. The outcome below is from the Legislature’s own step list.

What the bill does

Did not pass both chambers; the bill was filed on March 6, 2026.

It would have barred a public employer, school district or the State Board of Education from disciplining an employee for using gender-specific language in certain circumstances, and would have exempted employees from discipline when a workplace policy required such language to accommodate someone else. It never reached a floor vote: a House committee returned it to the Rules Committee, and it was filed on March 6, 2026.

This bill prohibits certain employment action against a public employee in relation to gender-specific language.

  • Prohibits the State Board of Education, a local education agency, or a public employer from taking disciplinary action against an employee for using gender-specific language in certain circumstances
  • Requires a public employer that has a rule or policy requiring an employee to use gender-specific language to accommodate another individual to exempt the employee from disciplinary action in certain circumstances
  • Makes technical changes

The description and list come from the bill's own long title as recorded by the Legislature; the paragraph above is the Ledger’s summary. Read the official bill. The Ledger takes no position on it.

Subjects: Education · K-12 Education · State Board of Education · State Officers and Employees · Local Education Agencies (LEAs)

How it moved

  1. · House1st reading (Introduced)Rules Committee
  2. · Houseto standing committeeGovernment Operations Committee
  3. · HouseHouse Comm - Recommends Returned to RulesGovernment Operations Committee
  4. · Housefiledfile for bills not passed

Steps as the Legislature recorded them; clerical and fiscal-staff entries are left out. Numbers such as 54-14-7 are yeas, nays and absent.

Fiscal note

The Legislative Fiscal Analyst's note on H.B. 95 found no material cost or revenue effect for the state, local governments or businesses.

Bill overview

Sponsor: Nicholeen P. Peck

Legislature passed-list status: Not available in the saved metadata.

Passed-list membership is not a finding that a bill was signed or took effect. A bill absent from that list is not necessarily pending or defeated.

Latest recorded action

filed
Action date:

The full step list is above. Find the bill in the official session list for status, hearings and committee records.

Recorded floor votes

No floor-vote records for this bill and session are available here. This does not mean no vote occurred; consult the official bill record.

Ledger coverage

No Ledger stories with an explicit source link to this bill and session are listed here.